This is cool! Check out the link for a resource that can help answer questions about D-Wave quantum computers from the perspective of our users at NASA.
We were on NOVA’s Making Stuff program last week. Here’s the segment where we appeared. It’s pretty … cool.
Google produced a most excellent video introducing some of the folks working at the Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab. Here it is!
You can see some cool shots of our new facility in the piece, like this one.
There are more that a dozen of these machines doing interesting things now. They are crunching away on everything from basic physics experiments, probing entanglement on scales that humans have never been able to before, to commercial applications of machine learning — like the wink detector in the Google Glass product.
There are some great memes in the video. One of my favorites was raised by Sergio Boixo. He says at 4:25, ‘… [this machine] teaches us that we shouldn’t be naive about the world, and we shouldn’t think about the world as a simple machine. It forces us to consider more sophisticated notions of how the reality around us is actually shaped.’
I lay awake at nights wondering whether simply we as a species are simply too stupid to figure out the Universe that we are investigating, and maybe we need some other species one percent smarter than we are, for which string theory would be intuitive, for which all the greatest mysteries of the Universe, from dark matter, dark energy, the origins of life, and all the frontiers of our thought, would be something that they would just self-intuit. I’m jealous of that possibility. Because I want to be around for those discoveries.
I feel a lot of sympathy for this position. It got me thinking that waiting for the “real one percenters” to show up might be dangerous. Maybe it’s a better strategy to try to create them. If only we had some type of quantum artificial intelligence…
Here is a very cool video from friends at Google… couldn’t agree more. The world needs more big dreams.
You don’t spent your time being bothered that you can’t teleport from here to Japan. Because there’s a part of you that thinks it’s impossible. Moonshot thinking is choosing to be bothered by that… our ambitions are a glass ceiling on what we can accomplish. — Astro Teller
One of the most important things to try to understand about real quantum computers is how they behave in the presence of environments. Sometimes these environments are called ‘baths’ by physicists. I like this term because it’s really evocative of what’s physically going on. You can imagine any quantum system you’re building as always being ‘bathed’ in the glow of these environments.
It’s a very interesting fact that you can never get away from these baths, even in principle. No object in our universe — as far as we know — can be completely isolated from the rest of the universe. As Lawrence Krauss so eloquently describes, even ‘nothing’ is something.
Even if we were to build a quantum computer in the depths of interstellar space, and cool it to zero temperature, it would still be bathed in a bath formed of the virtual particles that boil and seethe in the fabric of space-time itself. There is no escape from our connections to the physical universe.
A Lovecraftian aside that has nothing to do with the paper or the NPR interview
By the way you Lovecraft fans out there — here is a famous bit from The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath:
[O]utside the ordered universe [is] that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
Lovecraft had an uncanny ability to grok modern concepts from physics and weave them into his stories. His descriptions of Azathoth, and the physics underlying Krauss’ explanations of what seems to be physically occurring deep inside the fabric of spacetime, are just too close to not point out. Of course they use different language. But think carefully about the context in which these ideas are being delivered. (Am I stretching making a connection between Krauss’ something that lives in nothing and Lovecraft’s description of Azathoth? Definitely. But I think it’s an interesting thing to think about how these two descriptions might not be incompatible.)
Back to qubits and baths
Anyway back to qubits and baths. This is not just fascinating science (although it is that). It is also a fundamentally important issue in constructing computing machines that harness quantum mechanics. Because all quantum systems MUST live in baths, it’s extremely important to understand in detail how these baths affect their behavior.
Not so long ago, it was suspected that these baths would always destroy the curious properties of quantum mechanics for large objects. But then this turned out to not be true. The first large objects where quantum behavior remained even in the presence of really big and hot baths were loops of superconducting metal — the great – great – great grandparents of our qubits.
Now the question of what effect these baths really have on large collections of large objects is being debated, and goes to the heart of many of the technical issues in building useful quantum computers.
The paper that just published
The paper that just published is called Thermally assisted quantum annealing of a 16-qubit problem.
It describes what I believe to be a key result in advancing this understanding. It looks very carefully at what happens to a quantum system in the presence of a bath, where both the quantum system and the bath have been exquisitely characterized. As was the case when macroscopic quantum coherence was first observed, the results are counter-intuitive.
Here is the abstract from the paper.
Efforts to develop useful quantum computers have been blocked primarily by environmental noise. Quantum annealing is a scheme of quantum computation that is predicted to be more robust against noise, because despite the thermal environment mixing the system’s state in the energy basis, the system partially retains coherence in the computational basis, and hence is able to establish well-defined eigenstates. Here we examine the environment’s effect on quantum annealing using 16 qubits of a superconducting quantum processor. For a problem instance with an isolated small-gap anticrossing between the lowest two energy levels, we experimentally demonstrate that, even with annealing times eight orders of magnitude longer than the predicted single-qubit decoherence time, the probabilities of performing a successful computation are similar to those expected for a fully coherent system. Moreover, for the problem studied, we show that quantum annealing can take advantage of a thermal environment to achieve a speedup factor of up to 1,000 over a closed system.
The key result is that for the specific type of bath acting on a real processor, the quantum effects required for quantum computation can successfully be tapped by protecting them in a specific way. Specifically — and this is a point that has caused much confusion — the decoherence time of the individual qubits, which is the time to decohere in the energy basis, does not set the timescale for losing quantum coherence in the measurement basis. Quantum coherence in the measurement basis (which is the resource tapped in this approach) is an equilibrium property of the system, as long as the bath is not so big and hot that well defined energy eigenstates disappear.
While the paper is primarily an experimental paper, the theory underlying all of this is very satisfactory in my view. Mohammad and his collaborators have developed a very good theoretical understanding of what really happens in real open quantum systems, and the agreement between these models and what is seen in the lab is striking.
So congratulations to all on this result.
The NPR interview and my proudness at working ‘meatiest’ into a national radio program
On a mostly unrelated note, here is a radio piece that Geoff Brumfiel of NPR did recently. It is of note because I managed to work in the word ‘meatiest’ into the discussion, of which I am understandably quite proud.
Here is a short piece describing what Lockheed Martin and scientists at USC think about D-Wave technology.
Here is a great quote from the piece.
It’s a game changer for the corporation, it’s a game changer for our customers, and ultimately it’s a game changer for humanity. Computationally this is the equivalent of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk.
- Greg Tallant, Research Engineering Manager, Flight Control & VMS Integration – FW, Advanced Development Programs, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
This is cool. Check out this short promo vid for a new iPad app developed by Lockheed featuring D-Wave technology.
Here’s an article written about disruptive technology in Canada featuring a case study of the impact D-Wave could have on future innovation in healthcare:
From the article:
“Many health experts believe that in the next five to ten years, quantum computing will radically improve the ability to understand, treat and cure diseases.”